Greenfield Partners in Place
Two asks are open for Greenfield right now, each with the date it closes. Nothing else is waiting on you — the next Compass cycle doesn't open until Feb 2027.
Every card opens the tab behind it. "Beyond the plan" counts events you ran that weren't in this year's Annual Approach — here, the Winter Market listening post. It's worth seeing because it's where the work goes when the plan doesn't fit: that one event reached 61 people, your largest of the year, and it's the clearest prompt for what next year's plan should say.
PiP Plan
Your Place Scan, Strategy and each year's Annual Approach — the plan set, in one place.
| Place Scan | Submitted | Apr 2024 | |
| Strategy 2024–2029 | Submitted, living | Aug 2024 (updated Feb 2026) | |
| Annual Approach 2024–25 | Submitted | Sep 2024 | |
| Annual Approach 2025–26 | Submitted | Jul 2025 | |
| Annual Approach 2026–27 | Draft — in progress | started Jun 2026 | Continue draft |
Learning loop
PiP practice check-in — fortnightly · Round 5 of 26 · 78% responded last round
Your team
What's underway this year? From your Annual Approach 2026–27 — log events against these as they happen.
| Activity | Lever | Status | Partners | Steps | Events | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embed youth voice in the Council Plan refresh | Policy & strategy | in progress | Youth Advisory Group |
2/4
|
1 | |
|
KPI: Young people on the co-design panel — 9 of 12 (current total)
Steps come from the Annual Approach. Ticking one updates the plan, not the log. |
||||||
| Mental wellbeing lens in open-space planning | Policy & strategy | planned | Parks & Recreation | — | — | |
|
Steps come from the Annual Approach. Ticking one updates the plan, not the log. |
||||||
| Youth Advisory Group — monthly sessions | Community engagement | in progress | Youth Advisory Group, Northside CH | — | 2 | |
|
Steps come from the Annual Approach. Ticking one updates the plan, not the log. |
||||||
| Co-designed wellbeing campaign with secondary schools | Community engagement | planned | Greenfield Secondary College, headspace | — | — | |
|
Steps come from the Annual Approach. Ticking one updates the plan, not the log. |
||||||
| After-hours drop-in program at Northside hub | Program delivery | in progress | Northside Community Health |
2/4
|
1 | |
|
KPI: Average attendees per drop-in night — 32 of 30 target (current total)
Steps come from the Annual Approach. Ticking one updates the plan, not the log. |
||||||
| Coach wellbeing training in local sports clubs | Program delivery | in progress | Parks & Recreation | — | 1 | |
|
Steps come from the Annual Approach. Ticking one updates the plan, not the log. |
||||||
A = Greenfield activity; steps come from the Annual Approach. Lever = the type of change strategy (Policy & strategy · Community engagement · Program delivery).
What's happened lately? Planned or not — if it happened, it counts.
| Date | Event | Linked to | Reach | Logged by | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Jun 2026 | Pop-up listening post at Winter Market
young people, low SES |
beyond the plan | 61 | Priya | |
| 24 Jun 2026 | Coach session — Greenfield United FC
young people |
→ A6 | 12 | Priya | |
| 20 Jun 2026 | June drop-in night
41 registered · 34 attended · 9 new · young people, CARM · involved |
→ A5 | 34 | Marcus (Northside) | |
| 14 Jun 2026 | Co-design workshop 1 — Council Plan
young people, CARM |
→ A1 → A3 | 18 | Priya | |
| 11 Jun 2026 | Youth Advisory Group — June meeting
young people |
→ A3 | 9 | Priya |
Events carry their own lever and populations — linking to a planned activity is encouraged, not required. One event can serve several activities: the co-design workshop counts for both the Council Plan work and the Youth Advisory Group.
One tab that gathers the engagement and program data already scattered across Events, Activities and the quarterly report — people reached, who they were, and what the delivery is showing against the recommended evaluation questions. Added from PiP team feedback, with the caveat it came with: places differ enough that some of this may be too varied to summarise the same way. Nothing here is new work — every number below is already logged somewhere else on this page. The blanks are where the current capture doesn't ask the question yet.
Who you reached
Populations are recorded per event, so everyone at an event carries that event's tags. Counts overlap and don't sum to 134.
Four populations were never ticked this quarter. That is a capture question, not necessarily a reach question — the log makes them optional.
Against the recommended evaluation questions
The questions the PiP reporting framework recommends every place answer — filled from what Greenfield has already logged.
| Recommended question | Greenfield, this quarter | Comes from |
|---|---|---|
| How many people did delivered activities reach? | 134 · 512 this year | Event log |
| How many were new to council or partner engagement? | 9 — recorded at 1 of 5 events | Event detail (optional) |
| Are you reaching priority populations? | 61 low SES · 52 CARM · 113 of 134 | Event populations |
| At what depth were people engaged? | Involved — recorded at 1 of 5 events | Event detail (IAP2 scale) |
| Are participants reporting a wellbeing change? | 64% of drop-in attendees say they have somewhere to go on a bad night (target 70%) | Activity KPI — A5 |
| Youth-led activities delivered (LI-02) | 14 this financial year | Indicator reading |
Two of the six answers rest on a single event — the June drop-in night is the only one logged with full detail. That is the honest state of the data, and it is the thing to weigh before building this tab: it either shows a program, or it shows how optional the detail is today.
Who are you working with? Add a partner once, use them everywhere.
| Partner | Kind | Nature | Role | Status | Portal | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northside Community Health | external | Formal MOU | Delivery lead — drop-in program | engaged | Signed in | |
| Parks & Recreation team | internal | Cross-council team | Open-space planning, sports clubs | engaged | — | |
| Greenfield Youth Advisory Group | external | Standing group, TOR agreed | Youth voice in governance | engaged | — | |
| Greenfield Secondary College | external | Informal | Co-design partner, campaign | engaged | — | |
| headspace Greenfield | external | Referral protocol | Campaign clinical advisor | engaged | — | |
| Neighbourhood Houses Network | external | — | Venue + outreach (scan contact) | prospective | — |
One register for the five years. The Strategy and each Annual Approach draw from this list — add a partner once, use them everywhere.
How the plan has grown — five years, one document set.
| Document | Year | Status | Updated | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place Scan | — | Submitted | Apr 2024 | Open |
| Strategy 2024–2029 | — | Submitted, living | Aug 2024 (updated Feb 2026) | Open |
| Annual Approach 2024–25 | 2024–25 | Submitted | Sep 2024 | Open |
| Annual Approach 2025–26 | 2025–26 | Submitted | Jul 2025 | Open |
| Annual Approach 2026–27 | 2026–27 | Draft — in progress | started Jun 2026 | Continue |
Documents don't hold copies. The partner table inside your Strategy is this register; the delivery table inside your Annual Approach is the activity list. Only Annual Approaches belong to a year — the Place Scan and Strategy span the five years.
What Greenfield is learning — the assessment, the check-in rhythm, and what comes back from VicHealth. Nothing here is new work; it accumulates from what you already do.
Compass
Your maturity assessment, over time.
| 2024 | 2.1 | Developing | first cycle |
| 2025 | 2.6 | Developing | ▲ 0.5 |
| 2026 | 2.9 | Developing — top of the band | ▲ 0.3 |
The score names a band, not a mark: emerging (1) · developing (2) · establishing (3) · embedding (4) · embedded (5). Greenfield sits at the top of "developing" — another 0.1 moves the whole assessment into "establishing".
Next cycle opens Feb 2027 — it will appear in the due-now strip.
Check-in rhythm
PiP practice check-in — fortnightly.
Round 5 of 26 · 78% responded last round
Next check-in closes 8 Jul.
Suggested resources Concept
A sketch for discussion — not built. The idea: where your Compass shows the most room to move, the platform offers a standard set of resources for that lever, the same set for every place.
Policy & strategy
Your thinnest lever right now — of your two policy activities, one is in progress and one hasn't started, and policy is the least-logged lever across the whole program this quarter (5 events of 42).
| Embedding wellbeing in a Council Plan — worked example | VicHealth, 2025 |
| Youth advisory groups: terms of reference template | PiP library |
| Making the case to Exec — a two-page brief structure | PiP library |
Illustrative titles. The open question is who curates the set and whether "least-logged lever" is the right trigger — a quiet lever can mean the work is going fine without events.
Shared back from VicHealth
Teams are finding the fortnightly rhythm workable. The common thread this round: recruiting young people to panels is slower than planned, and school partnerships are opening doors that formal channels didn't.
Written by the VicHealth program team and shared with Greenfield. Shares are per-council: only your team sees what lands here, and you don't see what's shared with other councils. This one draws on every council's round 4 check-ins, but it names no council.
What your data is saying
- Drop-in reach is your dominant mode this quarter — 34 of 134 people reached came through the single June drop-in night.
- One of your five events this quarter was beyond the plan — the Winter Market listening post reached 61 people, your largest single-event reach of the year.
- The panel is at 9 of 12 with one co-design workshop still to go — if July's session holds, you end the planning cycle on target.
MEL plan
View indicators and KEQsYour indicators, key evaluation questions and measures live in the Annual Approach draft. The link opens directly to the indicators section.
This fortnight's check-in
PiP practice check-in · closes 8 Jul · Round 5 of 26
One check-in per fortnight. This round asks about your overall practice and partnership rhythm.
0/5000
Responses are visible to your team and VicHealth program staff. They feed the synthesis shared back each round.